When Ray Krone was first convicted of the rape and murder of
Kim Anacona the evidence was weak. The prosecution relied mostly on bite marks
found on the victim’s neck and breast, and because an “expert” claimed the bite
marks matched those found on the victim.
After spending two years and eight months on death row, Ray
was granted another trial, but was once again convicted of the same crime
despite the fact that other experts disputed and disproved the original experts
claims. However, the judge, who knew the bite mark evidence was weak, reduced
Ray’s sentence to 46 years in prison (which was essentially life considering
Ray was 35 years old at the time).
After spending 10 years in prison (2 years and 8 months on
death row), Ray now walks free with his charges dismissed. There is, however,
something to be said about Ray being falsely convicted two times.
If the United States justice system screwed up Ray’s case
twice because of junk science, prosecutorial misconduct and other things, how
many of the other 3,000 plus other death row inmates have also been falsely
convicted? Ray’s story should serve as an example and should also raise the
question, “Is it worth it?” Is it worth it to risk executing an innocent
person? What purpose will lowering ourselves to murder serve in the end? The
death penalty serves no purpose in our justice system other than a “justified”
form of murder. It is a money eating, broken and immoral system that must be
abolished.
No comments:
Post a Comment